First, some good news. It is TWO-FOLD.
- I had A Dewdrop Away reviewed on Reader’s Favorite and I managed to wangle a five-star out of them! (I should clarify that this does not mean I bribed them, just that 5 stars was a pleasant surprise) ❤ Here’s the beauteous review in all its glory: https://readersfavorite.com/book-review/a-dewdrop-away
- I had two of my poems published in Verse-Virtual, an online literary magazine/community of writers. Look at my stuff here: http://www.verse-virtual.com/ca-allen-2015-april.html (also, check out the rest of the April issue, there are some GREAT poets contributing this time around.) What makes Verse-Virtual really special is that with each accepted submission, you’re given a little author bio of the poet and an email address, and then encouraged to contact them to tell them what you think of their work. I think this is AWESOME, and there is far too little of that type of community among writers.
Now to the task at hand. Fact of the matter is, I got up this morning and finished a book, popped on Goodreads to review it and realized I am a staggering 10 or so books behind my goal (100). NOOOOO. This is not acceptable. I’ve read only 14/100 books and 10 of those were manga (which, let’s face it, don’t take a very long time to blow through) So, I’ve sucked at reading so far this year. WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT. That’s when I had the brilliant idea to actually act on my idea to review books here more frequently.
I’m aiming to review whatever books I’ve read during the week, once a week, on this blog. This is to encourage myself (kick my ass) into trying to get through at least a book a week. Though no one should be expecting my reviews to be ‘professional’ by far, I would like to have at least some sort of rating code to refer to. Which brings me to this:
I hate rating books.
In fact, for a very long time, I stayed away from Goodreads BECAUSE I hate rating books. What a book means to me is so hard to define and sometimes even shifts with time. It is also, so, so SUBJECTIVE. All the same, since I do a lot of reviews of books I read here, I decided to formulate a rating system that works okay for me. Remember, this isn’t really objectively about how good the book really was, how ‘quality’ in terms of literature, just about how engaged I got with it and how I personally felt. I make no claims that you’ll like every book I rate high—what was a five star for me might be a two star for another person, and so on.
Also, you will find that I never rate a book below 3 stars. This is because quite frankly, if I don’t like a book on at least a three star level, I won’t continue reading it. Life’s too short, and there are so many books on my too-read list already, it gives me anxiety, which would only be amplified if I felt like I had to finish every book I started.
So every book I rate/review here is a book I personally liked on some level, though I will also give any negatives as well in order to make it well-rounded. ALSO, there will probably be spoilers, though I’ll try to keep them of more of a minor nature.
Here’s the key to what each rating means for me:
3 stars: May have been a bit cheesy/cliche, and perhaps had more 2d characters than anything else, but was overall a good, swift read with a decently intriguing plot.
4 stars: Might be slow-paced or clunky at times, but very emotionally resonant and/or thought-provoking and keen. Usually a few good well-rounded characters at least with an intriguing plot.
5 stars: can’t put it down, resonant and thought-provoking, will think about this book for a long time after reading. Lots of excellent, interesting characters, fantastic plot.
I also rate 3.5 (between a 3 and a 4) and 4.5 (between a 4 and a 5) : )
Poetry is a little different and a lot simpler. I don’t rate half-stars.
3 stars: LOVED several of the poems, liked a few more
4 stars: LOVED about half of the poems, liked a lot more
5 stars: LOVED most of the poems
I am wide open to reading suggestions– To give you an idea of what I like, I read a lot of fantasy, a lot of ‘contemporary’ fiction, some memoir, some horror/speculative stuff, psychological thrillers, and poetry. I’m not super into sci-fi, teen/YA fiction, crime thrillers, or nonfiction, but hey, there are always exceptions. If you read a book, any book, and fell in love with it, and maybe want to hear my blathering thoughts on it, shoot me an email at the address I’ve mentioned below!
Also, if you’re an independent author and you’ve written a book you feel I might like, go ahead and rec. it to me! I’ll try and give anything I’m recced a shot, and I’ll review everything I finish reading here. If you don’t see a review of your book here, it could be because a) I haven’t got to it yet. My reading list is monstrous, OR b) I tried it and it just wasn’t my thing (this does NOT mean it was bad, just that I wasn’t personally digging it). Please don’t inquire about it. If I do read and review your book, I will let you know right away when the post with the review is up! : )
Please send any recs to firstname.lastname@example.org with the subject line “BOOK RECOMMENDATION YOU FOOL” in all caps so I don’t miss it (I consider the “you fool” part necessary, though “knave” and “scoundrel” are also acceptable, as well as other villainous titles- points for creativity!). All I need in the actual email is the name of the author, the title of the book, and maybe a link of where I can find it. A brief summary of why you recommend it is great if you’re feeling inspired but it’s absolutely not necessary. Also include the best way I can reach you to let you know if I’ve reviewed your recommendation.
Disclaimer: I can’t promise any review I write will be particularly professional or polished. They are my thoughts as a nosy, nerdy reader first, a writer second… and a critic third. But at the very least I hope they’re amusing for you, and if I do review a book YOU wrote, I’d be more than happy to repost it to any media/sites you like (Goodreads, Amazon, etc.), just ask!
And finally: You will also find I’ve put all this info up on a separate page, entitled “MY REVIEWS”, so that it can be referred to for….future reference?